Calecia.com




Discussions

> Search   > Members

> Profile   > Log in

> Register
Take No Prisoners
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Calecia.com Discussions Forum Index -> Current Events & Social Issues
Author Message
Americano
Coffee


Joined: 18 May 2003
Posts: 1640
Location: fair Verona
Reputation: 75.9Reputation: 75.9

PostPosted: 16 Dec 2003 09:42 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

elchrist wrote:
Ame-ricano wrote:
If they had a chance an Iraqian would shoot any American with thinking twice about it. So I say fuck it.


If you woke up in the middle of the night only to find a burglar* in your home armed with a gun, would you not shoot him?


* In this case the burglar is the USA.


If the burglar was there to get rid of my asshole landlord who has been killing and starving the tenants. I would let him shoot the fucken landlord.
Back to top
Sponsored Links
Mars
Tecato Revisited


Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 1363
Location: mangled in blackhole
Reputation: 81.6Reputation: 81.6

PostPosted: 19 Dec 2003 09:05 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ame-ricano wrote:
elchrist wrote:
Ame-ricano wrote:
If they had a chance an Iraqian would shoot any American with thinking twice about it. So I say fuck it.


If you woke up in the middle of the night only to find a burglar* in your home armed with a gun, would you not shoot him?


* In this case the burglar is the USA.


If the burglar was there to get rid of my asshole landlord who has been killing and starving the tenants. I would let him shoot the fucken landlord.


Ya calmate, Pinche GI Joe.
Back to top
bemisnorris
Cole


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 2096
Location: Not Here
Reputation: 91.4Reputation: 91.4
Votes: 1

PostPosted: 24 Dec 2003 10:34 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

bemisnorris wrote:
I think this statement by Howard Dean puts Saddam Hussein's capture in proper perspective:

"...I do not think that it makes America's homeland safer, and we do need to make sure that we focus and continue to focus on stopping terror and stopping al Qaeda, because al Qaeda is the real danger and focus for the United States of America."

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/16/elec04.prez.dems.iraq/index.html

As does this article from The Philadelphia Enquirer:

The war on terror toppled a figurehead yesterday, not a mastermind or even a major leader. Although the capture gave the United States and the Bush administration a huge psychological victory in Iraq, the effort to defeat the forces of anti-American violence worldwide was mostly unaffected.


I think the fact that the terror alert has been raised only a week after Saddam Hussein's capture proves that his capture is irrelevant to the security of the United States.
Back to top
Americano
Coffee


Joined: 18 May 2003
Posts: 1640
Location: fair Verona
Reputation: 75.9Reputation: 75.9

PostPosted: 24 Dec 2003 10:47 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

bemisnorris wrote:
bemisnorris wrote:
I think this statement by Howard Dean puts Saddam Hussein's capture in proper perspective:

"...I do not think that it makes America's homeland safer, and we do need to make sure that we focus and continue to focus on stopping terror and stopping al Qaeda, because al Qaeda is the real danger and focus for the United States of America."

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/16/elec04.prez.dems.iraq/index.html

As does this article from The Philadelphia Enquirer:

The war on terror toppled a figurehead yesterday, not a mastermind or even a major leader. Although the capture gave the United States and the Bush administration a huge psychological victory in Iraq, the effort to defeat the forces of anti-American violence worldwide was mostly unaffected.


I think the fact that the terror alert has been raised only a week after Saddam Hussein's capture proves that his capture is irrelevant to the security of the United States.




It's like a street gang. You kill (capture) some from the other gang and soon that gang is going to avenge their death (capture). It's better to be safe than sorry. Besides, the US always gets out on high alert on Holidays, ever since 9/11.
Back to top
bemisnorris
Cole


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 2096
Location: Not Here
Reputation: 91.4Reputation: 91.4
Votes: 1

PostPosted: 24 Dec 2003 10:54 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ame-ricano wrote:
bemisnorris wrote:
bemisnorris wrote:
I think this statement by Howard Dean puts Saddam Hussein's capture in proper perspective:

"...I do not think that it makes America's homeland safer, and we do need to make sure that we focus and continue to focus on stopping terror and stopping al Qaeda, because al Qaeda is the real danger and focus for the United States of America."

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/16/elec04.prez.dems.iraq/index.html

As does this article from The Philadelphia Enquirer:

The war on terror toppled a figurehead yesterday, not a mastermind or even a major leader. Although the capture gave the United States and the Bush administration a huge psychological victory in Iraq, the effort to defeat the forces of anti-American violence worldwide was mostly unaffected.


I think the fact that the terror alert has been raised only a week after Saddam Hussein's capture proves that his capture is irrelevant to the security of the United States.


It's like a street gang. You kill (capture) some from the other gang and soon that gang is going to avenge their death (capture). It's better to be safe than sorry. Besides, the US always gets out on high alert on Holidays, ever since 9/11.


Point is that Saddam Hussein was never an immediate threat to the United States and that his capture doesn't do shit for the "war on terror".
Back to top
Sponsored Links
Americano
Coffee


Joined: 18 May 2003
Posts: 1640
Location: fair Verona
Reputation: 75.9Reputation: 75.9

PostPosted: 24 Dec 2003 11:07 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

bemisnorris wrote:
Ame-ricano wrote:
bemisnorris wrote:
bemisnorris wrote:
I think this statement by Howard Dean puts Saddam Hussein's capture in proper perspective:

"...I do not think that it makes America's homeland safer, and we do need to make sure that we focus and continue to focus on stopping terror and stopping al Qaeda, because al Qaeda is the real danger and focus for the United States of America."

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/16/elec04.prez.dems.iraq/index.html

As does this article from The Philadelphia Enquirer:

The war on terror toppled a figurehead yesterday, not a mastermind or even a major leader. Although the capture gave the United States and the Bush administration a huge psychological victory in Iraq, the effort to defeat the forces of anti-American violence worldwide was mostly unaffected.


I think the fact that the terror alert has been raised only a week after Saddam Hussein's capture proves that his capture is irrelevant to the security of the United States.


It's like a street gang. You kill (capture) some from the other gang and soon that gang is going to avenge their death (capture). It's better to be safe than sorry. Besides, the US always gets out on high alert on Holidays, ever since 9/11.


Point is that Saddam Hussein was never an immediate threat to the United States and that his capture doesn't do shit for the "war on terror".


It does a lot to Bush's ego.
Back to top
bemisnorris
Cole


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 2096
Location: Not Here
Reputation: 91.4Reputation: 91.4
Votes: 1

PostPosted: 24 Dec 2003 11:20 AM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ame-ricano wrote:
bemisnorris wrote:
Ame-ricano wrote:
bemisnorris wrote:
bemisnorris wrote:
I think this statement by Howard Dean puts Saddam Hussein's capture in proper perspective:

"...I do not think that it makes America's homeland safer, and we do need to make sure that we focus and continue to focus on stopping terror and stopping al Qaeda, because al Qaeda is the real danger and focus for the United States of America."

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/16/elec04.prez.dems.iraq/index.html

As does this article from The Philadelphia Enquirer:

The war on terror toppled a figurehead yesterday, not a mastermind or even a major leader. Although the capture gave the United States and the Bush administration a huge psychological victory in Iraq, the effort to defeat the forces of anti-American violence worldwide was mostly unaffected.


I think the fact that the terror alert has been raised only a week after Saddam Hussein's capture proves that his capture is irrelevant to the security of the United States.


It's like a street gang. You kill (capture) some from the other gang and soon that gang is going to avenge their death (capture). It's better to be safe than sorry. Besides, the US always gets out on high alert on Holidays, ever since 9/11.


Point is that Saddam Hussein was never an immediate threat to the United States and that his capture doesn't do shit for the "war on terror".


It does a lot to Bush's ego.


Yeah...and that really makes us better off. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Mars
Tecato Revisited


Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 1363
Location: mangled in blackhole
Reputation: 81.6Reputation: 81.6

PostPosted: 26 Dec 2003 04:35 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ame-ricano wrote:
elchrist wrote:
Ame-ricano wrote:
If they had a chance an Iraqian would shoot any American with thinking twice about it. So I say fuck it.


If you woke up in the middle of the night only to find a burglar* in your home armed with a gun, would you not shoot him?


* In this case the burglar is the USA.


If the burglar was there to get rid of my asshole landlord who has been killing and starving the tenants. I would let him shoot the fucken landlord.


What if when shooting your asshole landlord some shot ripped throught the wall and hit your sister and mother? Was it still worth it to get the landlord out?
Back to top
Americano
Coffee


Joined: 18 May 2003
Posts: 1640
Location: fair Verona
Reputation: 75.9Reputation: 75.9

PostPosted: 26 Dec 2003 05:08 PM    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mars wrote:
Ame-ricano wrote:
elchrist wrote:
Ame-ricano wrote:
If they had a chance an Iraqian would shoot any American with thinking twice about it. So I say fuck it.


If you woke up in the middle of the night only to find a burglar* in your home armed with a gun, would you not shoot him?


* In this case the burglar is the USA.


If the burglar was there to get rid of my asshole landlord who has been killing and starving the tenants. I would let him shoot the fucken landlord.


What if when shooting your asshole landlord some shot ripped throught the wall and hit your sister and mother? Was it still worth it to get the landlord out?


That's Collateral Damage
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Calecia.com Discussions Forum Index -> Current Events & Social Issues All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3